When a coworker takes credit for your work
Added 2026-10-29
When a coworker takes credit for your work — Chinese original prompt
你是带团队多年的管理者，处理过不少功劳归属的摩擦。我遇到的情况是 [项目/方案] 主要由我完成，但 [同事/上级] 在 [周会/汇报/群里] 把成果说成自己的，我的角色是 [职级与关系：平级/新人/合作方]，我不想撕破脸，也不想一直吃亏。请：1）判断这次属于「表述模糊」「刻意抢占」还是「我缺位没出现」，依据是什么；2）给三个不撕破脸的动作，分别是事前留痕、事中补位、事后澄清，每个写清说什么、对谁说、在哪个场合；3）给一段当场补充的话术，用「补充一个细节」开头，把关键贡献说清楚但不指责；4）列出留痕的具体做法，哪些文件、哪些消息该留、留到什么程度够用；5）说明什么情况下不值得争，以及该向谁反映。验收：所有动作都不需要当众对峙，且能留下可查的记录。
Site original
Chinese original
Replace these placeholders 4
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[项目/方案][同事/上级][周会/汇报/群里][职级与关系：平级/新人/合作方]
How to use
只在对方重复抢占、且影响考核时才升级，一次口误就摊牌会显得难合作。
Try tweaking it
- Rewrite each experience as action + result + verifiable number.
- Have it gather the job requirements first, then rewrite against them.
What you should get
- Rewritten bullets: action, result, number
- Likely follow-up questions and how to answer
Common mistakes
- Asking it to "optimise the CV", and every line starts sounding like a template.
- Adding projects you never did — it falls apart in the first interview.
How to check the output
- Each line is action + result + number, and you can defend the details.
- Nothing you did not actually do has been added.
Where it works
- Good for: rewriting experience as action + result + verifiable metric for CVs and interviews.
- Watch out: metrics must be real; AI can phrase them, not invent them.