Proving you're irreplaceable at a promotion review
Added 2026-10-29
Proving you're irreplaceable at a promotion review — Chinese original prompt
你是做过多年晋升评审的管理者。我要参加 [职级/岗位] 的晋升答辩，限时 [分钟数]，我准备讲的项目是 [项目名与我的角色]，成绩是 [可量化结果]，评委里有 [直属上级/跨部门/技术专家]。请：1）判断我的材料是在讲「参与过」还是「不可替代」，逐条指出哪些句子换个人也能说；2）把经历重写成三条证据链，每条包含「当时的难点—只有我能做的判断—带来的结果」，并注明证据在哪；3）列出评委最可能质疑的三点，比如「这事是团队做的」「换别人也行」，各给一段 30 秒应答；4）指出我该砍掉的内容，时间不够时先删什么；5）给一版开场 30 秒，直接说明我能解决这个职级的什么问题。不要用「我学习能力强」这类没有证据的形容。验收：每条证据链都能回答「没有我会怎样」，且不出现无法核实的数字。
Site original
Chinese original
Replace these placeholders 5
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[职级/岗位][分钟数][项目名与我的角色][可量化结果][直属上级/跨部门/技术专家]
How to use
评委里有不熟业务的人时，先删行业黑话，别默认他们知道项目背景。
Try tweaking it
- Rewrite each experience as action + result + verifiable number.
- Have it gather the job requirements first, then rewrite against them.
What you should get
- Rewritten bullets: action, result, number
- Likely follow-up questions and how to answer
Common mistakes
- Asking it to "optimise the CV", and every line starts sounding like a template.
- Adding projects you never did — it falls apart in the first interview.
How to check the output
- Each line is action + result + number, and you can defend the details.
- Nothing you did not actually do has been added.
Where it works
- Good for: rewriting experience as action + result + verifiable metric for CVs and interviews.
- Watch out: metrics must be real; AI can phrase them, not invent them.