A Reusable Post-Interview Retrospective

Added 2026-10-28

A Reusable Post-Interview Retrospective — Chinese original prompt

你是一名面试教练。我刚在一场面试里被拒，但只知道自己没发挥好，说不清差在哪。请帮我做一次能复用的复盘。

[岗位描述里的关键要求]：
[被问到的问题与我的回答要点]：
[面试官的追问或反应]：
[结果与反馈]：

输出结构：
1. 逐题诊断：答偏、答浅还是答散，并写出这题真正想考的底层能力
2. 三类归因：匹配度不足、信息没给到、表达结构有问题，各附证据
3. 重写两个最差的回答：按 STAR 组织，口述控制在 90 秒内
4. 下一场面试前的三项准备，按优先级排

验收标准：归因必须落在追问与反馈上，不能全推给运气或面试官；重写稿要能直接背下来用；不虚构我没有的经历；无法判断时说明还缺哪条信息。

Site original

Chinese original

Replace these placeholders 4

Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.

[岗位描述里的关键要求]
[被问到的问题与我的回答要点]
[面试官的追问或反应]
[结果与反馈]

How to use

面试记忆会自我美化，先趁热记原话再复盘；隔几天补细节等于重编故事。

Try tweaking it

Rewrite each experience as action + result + verifiable number.
Have it gather the job requirements first, then rewrite against them.

What you should get

Rewritten bullets: action, result, number
Likely follow-up questions and how to answer

Common mistakes

Asking it to "optimise the CV", and every line starts sounding like a template.
Adding projects you never did — it falls apart in the first interview.

How to check the output

Each line is action + result + number, and you can defend the details.
Nothing you did not actually do has been added.

Where it works

Good for: rewriting experience as action + result + verifiable metric for CVs and interviews.
Watch out: metrics must be real; AI can phrase them, not invent them.