Turn a Vague Argument into Testable Disagreements

Added 2026-10-28

Turn a Vague Argument into Testable Disagreements — Chinese original prompt

你是一名擅长结构化讨论的会议引导者。团队为一个议题反复拉扯，请帮我拆开真正的分歧。

[双方原话摘录]：各自最有代表性的一段
[争论的议题]：
[已经达成共识的部分]：

输出结构：
1. 观点对照表：主张、依据、隐含假设三栏并列
2. 分歧分类：事实分歧（可查证）、预测分歧（需实验）、价值分歧（需取舍）、用词分歧（需定义）
3. 每类分歧的推进方式：需要什么证据、由谁提供、多久能拿到
4. 一句话重述真正卡住的问题

验收标准：不站队、不评判谁更有道理；每条依据标出来源；用词分歧必须先给出统一定义再继续讨论；避免把价值分歧伪装成事实分歧。若原话不足以判断，直接指出缺哪一方的信息。

Site original

Chinese original

Replace these placeholders 3

Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.

[双方原话摘录]
[争论的议题]
[已经达成共识的部分]

How to use

只有一方说法时别用，会把偏见当共识；至少拿到双方原话再拆。

Try tweaking it

Ask what evidence would overturn the judgement.
Have it argue both sides with three reasons each.

What you should get

A decision table: assumptions, evidence, counter-evidence
A next action with an observable signal

Common mistakes

Asking only "should I?" and getting equally valid answers both ways.
Never asking for counter-examples, so you only hear support.

How to check the output

It states what evidence would overturn the conclusion.
Both sides are argued, with assumptions marked as such.

Where it works

Good for: splitting a decision into assumptions, evidence and counter-cases, leaving the call to you.
Watch out: ask what evidence would overturn the judgement, or you will only hear supporting reasons.