When the client says it isn't premium enough
Added 2026-10-28 · Updated 2026-10-29
When the client says it isn't premium enough — Chinese original prompt
你是做过品牌视觉评审的设计总监。客户对我交付的 [物料类型：海报/详情页/封面] 只留了一句「不够高级」，没有别的修改意见。原稿情况是 [版式、字号层级、配色数量、留白和元素风格的大致描述]，用在哪 [投放位置与观看距离]，品牌想给人的感觉是 [三个形容词]。请：1）把「不够高级」拆成层级混乱、留白不足、配色过杂、元素风格不统一四类，逐条判断我的稿子中了哪几条，并指出具体位置；2）每条给一个改法，写清动哪个元素、改成什么、为什么；3）按改动性价比排序，标出只改一处时先改哪；4）给一版可执行的修改清单，含字号、间距、颜色的数值建议；5）指出改完仍可能被挑刺的地方。不要建议换图或重做，先榨干现有素材。验收：每条改法都能落到具体元素，不靠换素材。
Site original
Chinese original
Replace these placeholders 4
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[物料类型：海报/详情页/封面][版式、字号层级、配色数量、留白和元素风格的大致描述][投放位置与观看距离][三个形容词]
How to use
客户审美没共识时，先拿三版方向图对齐，别直接改稿。
Try tweaking it
- Swap style words for measurable parameters: light, lens, material, composition.
- Ask for three variants of one prompt, then compare the differences.
What you should get
- A parameter sheet you can act on (light, lens, material, framing)
- Two or three alternatives with trade-offs
Common mistakes
- Stacking words like "premium, cinematic, 8K" — no two results match.
- Asking for a real brand or celebrity look and getting something close but unusable.
How to check the output
- Parameters are executable — ready to use in a tool or hand to a designer.
- It explains the trade-offs, not just the final look.
Where it works
- Good for: breaking vague "premium feel" into concrete light, material, lens and composition parameters.
- Watch out: for real brands, celebrities or third-party work, use equivalent descriptions to avoid infringement.