Two offers, one comparable table
Added 2026-10-29
Two offers, one comparable table — Chinese original prompt
你是帮人看过 offer 的 HR。手上有两个 offer：A 是 [公司阶段、岗位、base、奖金结构、期权数量与行权价、补贴、试用期折扣]，B 是 [同上]，我目前年薪 [数字]，在意 [现金流、成长、稳定性、通勤]，最晚 [日期] 要给答复。请：1）把两项拆成同一口径的年度总包，列清每项的计算假设，期权按保守、中性、乐观三档估值并注明不确定性；2）算出三年累计现金收入，标出哪一年开始反超；3）列出没写进合同的模糊承诺，标成不能计入；4）指出我该向 A、B 分别确认哪三个问题，按优先级排；5）给两套谈薪话术：一套加 base，一套加签字费或期权；6）说明哪类条款值得为它放弃一部分现金。估值只是参考区间，不构成对未来收益的承诺。验收：同一口径下能算出差多少，模糊项都已单独标出。
Site original
Chinese original
Replace these placeholders 5
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[公司阶段、岗位、base、奖金结构、期权数量与行权价、补贴、试用期折扣][同上][数字][现金流、成长、稳定性、通勤][日期]
How to use
期权按三档分别估，别拿最乐观的数字做决定。
Try tweaking it
- Rewrite each experience as action + result + verifiable number.
- Have it gather the job requirements first, then rewrite against them.
What you should get
- Rewritten bullets: action, result, number
- Likely follow-up questions and how to answer
Common mistakes
- Asking it to "optimise the CV", and every line starts sounding like a template.
- Adding projects you never did — it falls apart in the first interview.
How to check the output
- Each line is action + result + number, and you can defend the details.
- Nothing you did not actually do has been added.
Where it works
- Good for: rewriting experience as action + result + verifiable metric for CVs and interviews.
- Watch out: metrics must be real; AI can phrase them, not invent them.