Test an Argument for Consistency
Added 2026-11-02
Separate premises from conclusion and look for a swapped standard.
Here is an argument. Check its consistency: 1) list premises and conclusion separately; 2) point out premises that are assumed but unstated; 3) check whether different standards are applied in different places; 4) suggest one strengthening that would make it hold better; 5) if the conclusion were false, which premise must fall first. Do not judge whether the conclusion is right, only the reasoning.
Site original
Chinese original
How to use
很多争论不是立场不同，是标准偷偷换了。
Try tweaking it
- Ask what evidence would overturn the judgement.
- Have it argue both sides with three reasons each.
What you should get
- A decision table: assumptions, evidence, counter-evidence
- A next action with an observable signal
Common mistakes
- Asking only "should I?" and getting equally valid answers both ways.
- Never asking for counter-examples, so you only hear support.
How to check the output
- It states what evidence would overturn the conclusion.
- Both sides are argued, with assumptions marked as such.
Where it works
- Good for: splitting a decision into assumptions, evidence and counter-cases, leaving the call to you.
- Watch out: ask what evidence would overturn the judgement, or you will only hear supporting reasons.