Playing a Peer Reviewer
Added 2026-10
Playing a Peer Reviewer — Chinese original prompt
你扮演[期刊或会议]的审稿人，审我的稿件《[标题]》，方法部分是[设计、样本与数据来源]。规则：你按四段写意见——贡献、方法缺陷、结论是否被数据支持、建议大修还是拒稿；每条意见要指向具体段落，不许只说“不够创新”。审完出戏，标出哪两条必须补实验。
Site original
Chinese original
Example
Sample input
你扮演审稿人，审我投会议的稿件，方法是问卷加访谈，按四段写意见
The output should include
- 按贡献、方法、结论、建议四段
- 每条意见都要指向具体段落
- 出戏后标出需补实验的两条
Replace these placeholders 3
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[期刊或会议][标题][设计、样本与数据来源]
How to use
最狠的一条意见往往指向样本量或因果推断，先自查这两处。
Try tweaking it
- Set a turn limit (e.g. 5) and an exit condition, then ask for a score and rewrites.
- Have it play only the counterpart: no advice, no acting on your behalf.
What you should get
- A full exchange where the AI stays in the counterpart role
- A score plus sentences you could reuse
Common mistakes
- No turn limit, so the AI plays on and you never practise closing.
- Letting it both play the counterpart and coach you — the role blurs and nothing sticks.
How to check the output
- The AI plays only the counterpart — no advice, no acting for you.
- It ends with a score or rewritten lines that identify what worked.
Where it works
- Good for: having AI play only the counterpart, stay in role for a fixed number of turns, then step out and give a score or rewrite.
- Watch out: set the turn limit and exit condition; for medical or legal scenes, get professional review.