Opposing Counsel Cross-Examination
Added 2026-10
Opposing Counsel Cross-Examination — Chinese original prompt
我是[角色]，要在[案件类型]中出庭说明[事实]，我的书面陈述是[陈述]。请扮演对方律师做交叉询问，一次只问一个问题，专攻时间线、记忆来源、利害关系，我回答后你再追问。全程不作法律建议，结束后指出我哪三处回答最容易被抓。
Site original
Chinese original
Example
Sample input
我是项目负责人，要在合同纠纷案中出庭说明交付时间，书面陈述在下面。
The output should include
- 一次只问一个问题再做追问
- 专攻时间线和记忆来源问题
- 全程不作法律建议，仅作参考
Replace these placeholders 4
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[角色][案件类型][事实][陈述]
How to use
只回答记得的，不确定就说记不清，别替自己补细节。
Try tweaking it
- Set a turn limit (e.g. 5) and an exit condition, then ask for a score and rewrites.
- Have it play only the counterpart: no advice, no acting on your behalf.
What you should get
- A full exchange where the AI stays in the counterpart role
- A score plus sentences you could reuse
Common mistakes
- No turn limit, so the AI plays on and you never practise closing.
- Letting it both play the counterpart and coach you — the role blurs and nothing sticks.
How to check the output
- The AI plays only the counterpart — no advice, no acting for you.
- It ends with a score or rewritten lines that identify what worked.
Where it works
- Good for: having AI play only the counterpart, stay in role for a fixed number of turns, then step out and give a score or rewrite.
- Watch out: set the turn limit and exit condition; for medical or legal scenes, get professional review.