Mediating a Two-Person Conflict
Added 2026-10
Mediating a Two-Person Conflict — Chinese original prompt
[同事A]和[同事B]因为[事件]起了冲突，A的说法是[表述]，B的说法是[表述]，已影响[工作]。请给我一份调解提纲：分开听各自版本要问的三个问题、共同在场的开场白、把「事实/解读/情绪」分开的表格、两条双方都能接受的下一步。不要判定谁对。
Site original
Chinese original
Example
Sample input
两个同事因为排班起了冲突，一个说对方临时改班不打招呼，一个说自己提前在群里说过。
The output should include
- 分开听各自版本并各问三个问题
- 开场白明确不判定谁对谁错
- 给事实解读情绪对照表与下一步
Replace these placeholders 5
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[同事A][同事B][事件][表述][工作]
How to use
先单独听再一起谈，当众评理只会让人更硬。
Try tweaking it
- Set a turn limit (e.g. 5) and an exit condition, then ask for a score and rewrites.
- Have it play only the counterpart: no advice, no acting on your behalf.
What you should get
- A full exchange where the AI stays in the counterpart role
- A score plus sentences you could reuse
Common mistakes
- No turn limit, so the AI plays on and you never practise closing.
- Letting it both play the counterpart and coach you — the role blurs and nothing sticks.
How to check the output
- The AI plays only the counterpart — no advice, no acting for you.
- It ends with a score or rewritten lines that identify what worked.
Where it works
- Good for: having AI play only the counterpart, stay in role for a fixed number of turns, then step out and give a score or rewrite.
- Watch out: set the turn limit and exit condition; for medical or legal scenes, get professional review.