Information Density in Prompts
Added 2026-10
Information Density in Prompts — Chinese original prompt
我的提示词写了[300]字，出图却很平。请逐句判断「这句是否改变画面」：保留[主体、环境、光、镜头、材质、后期]六类各一句，删掉形容词堆叠、重复近义词、画不出来的抽象词。输出瘦身前后对照，并指出被删的哪一句其实是关键信息，应该改写而不是删除。
Site original
Chinese original
Example
Sample input
提示词写了三百字，出图却很平。逐句判断这句是否改变画面，六类各留一句，删掉形容词和抽象词。
The output should include
- 逐句判断这句话是否改变画面
- 六类各留一句，给瘦身前后对照
- 指出被删的哪句其实是关键信息
Replace these placeholders 2
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[300][主体、环境、光、镜头、材质、后期]
How to use
抽象词不是废话，是要翻译成可视的东西，别一律删掉。
Try tweaking it
- Swap style words for measurable parameters: light, lens, material, composition.
- Ask for three variants of one prompt, then compare the differences.
What you should get
- A parameter sheet you can act on (light, lens, material, framing)
- Two or three alternatives with trade-offs
Common mistakes
- Stacking words like "premium, cinematic, 8K" — no two results match.
- Asking for a real brand or celebrity look and getting something close but unusable.
How to check the output
- Parameters are executable — ready to use in a tool or hand to a designer.
- It explains the trade-offs, not just the final look.
Where it works
- Good for: breaking vague "premium feel" into concrete light, material, lens and composition parameters.
- Watch out: for real brands, celebrities or third-party work, use equivalent descriptions to avoid infringement.