Infer Missing Words From a Fail
Added 2026-10
Infer Missing Words From a Fail — Chinese original prompt
这张图的问题是[主体偏小、背景杂乱、材质不像木头]。请反推提示词缺了哪类信息：是[主体与画面的比例没说]、[背景允许了什么]、还是[材质只写了名词没写表面]。每类给一条补充句，并说明补进去之后要删掉哪句旧描述，否则两句话会互相抵消。
Site original
Chinese original
Example
Sample input
出的图主体偏小、背景杂乱，木桌看着像塑料。反推缺的是比例、背景许可还是材质表面，各给补充句。
The output should include
- 三类缺失逐条判断并给补充句
- 说明补进去要删掉哪句旧描述
- 指出哪类问题最可能是主因
Replace these placeholders 4
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[主体偏小、背景杂乱、材质不像木头][主体与画面的比例没说][背景允许了什么][材质只写了名词没写表面]
How to use
补一句通常要删一句，提示词变长不等于变准。
Try tweaking it
- Swap style words for measurable parameters: light, lens, material, composition.
- Ask for three variants of one prompt, then compare the differences.
What you should get
- A parameter sheet you can act on (light, lens, material, framing)
- Two or three alternatives with trade-offs
Common mistakes
- Stacking words like "premium, cinematic, 8K" — no two results match.
- Asking for a real brand or celebrity look and getting something close but unusable.
How to check the output
- Parameters are executable — ready to use in a tool or hand to a designer.
- It explains the trade-offs, not just the final look.
Where it works
- Good for: breaking vague "premium feel" into concrete light, material, lens and composition parameters.
- Watch out: for real brands, celebrities or third-party work, use equivalent descriptions to avoid infringement.