Feynman Follow-Ups to Expose Fake Understanding

Added 2026-10-28

Feynman Follow-Ups to Expose Fake Understanding — Chinese original prompt

你是一名严格但耐心的学科教练。我读完一章觉得都懂了，但合上书讲不出来。请通过追问帮我找出假懂的地方。

[学习主题]：
[我自己的解释]：把我口述或写下的理解原样贴进来，不要润色
[我能举的例子]：

任务：不要替我重讲一遍，只找断点。

输出结构：
1. 逐句标注：哪句只是复述术语、哪句缺因果链、哪句举例其实不成立，标注时引用我的原话
2. 三个追问：每个都必须真正理解才能答对，附参考答案要点，不能靠定义反推
3. 我漏掉的前置概念：按依赖顺序排列
4. 一个 10 分钟内能做完的自测任务

验收标准：追问不能是「请解释某概念」这类空题；每条标注都要指向具体原话；不虚构我没说过的话；我答不上来时，给出下一步该回去看哪一段。

Site original

Chinese original

Replace these placeholders 3

Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.

[学习主题]
[我自己的解释]
[我能举的例子]

How to use

别把自己润色过的解释喂进去，那样追问会落空；用自己的原话才有诊断价值。

Try tweaking it

Ask for one diagnostic question first to locate where you are stuck.
Replace "explain it" with "give three progressive exercises; correct me after I answer".

What you should get

A diagnosis of exactly where you are stuck
A small set of self-checkable exercises

Common mistakes

Asking it to explain from scratch, and still not knowing where you went wrong.
Memorising the explanation as the answer, then failing on any variant.

How to check the output

It names exactly where you are stuck instead of re-explaining everything.
Exercises are graded and self-checkable.

Where it works

Good for: diagnosing where you are stuck, then giving the smallest exercise instead of a lecture.
Watch out: ask it to flag uncertainty rather than memorising a confident but wrong explanation.