A one-page risk memo for sign-off
Added 2026-10-29
A one-page risk memo for sign-off — Chinese original prompt
你是给管理层写决策材料的法务助理。这份 [合同类型] 我已看完，主要风险是 [列出三到五处]，交易金额 [数字]，对方是 [对方背景与强势程度]，老板只有 [五分钟/一页纸]。请：1）第一段就给结论：建议签、改后签还是不签，并写一句最关键的理由；2）风险按「最坏损失金额 × 发生概率」排序，每条写清触发条件、后果、条款位置；3）每条风险配一句改法，优先给能直接发给对方的措辞；4）标出哪些属于可接受的商业风险，不要全部写成红灯；5）给一段口头汇报用的三句话版本；6）留一栏「待确认」，写清还需要谁提供什么。不写空话，不用「建议关注」这类不落地的表述。这里只做条款梳理与表达，不构成法律意见，正式签署前请执业律师复核。验收：老板读完第一段就能做决定，每条风险都能指到原文。
Site original
Chinese original
Replace these placeholders 5
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[合同类型][列出三到五处][数字][对方背景与强势程度][五分钟/一页纸]
How to use
结论放第一段，风险按钱排序，别按条款顺序排。
Try tweaking it
- Ask for three openings in different tones, then pick one.
- Replace "make it better" with concrete limits: length, reader, facts to keep.
What you should get
- A publishable draft, not an outline
- A short changelog: what changed and why
Common mistakes
- Letting it guess the facts, so plausible-looking sources get invented.
- Dumping the whole text with just "polish it" — the result still has no point.
How to check the output
- The conclusion comes first; deleting the opening paragraph does not break it.
- Every fact, number and quote traces back to the source text.
Where it works
- Good for: turning a rambling draft into a conclusion-first, shorter version.
- Watch out: keep sources and figures verbatim — do not let it invent citations.