A 30k gap between two reports
Added 2026-10-29
A 30k gap between two reports — Chinese original prompt
你是做过财务与业务对账的分析师。A 表是 [报表名与用途]，B 表是 [报表名与用途]，同一期间 [时间范围] 的 [指标] 相差 [金额或比例]，两边口径说明分别是 [口径]。请：1）列出至少八个能解释这个差距的假设，覆盖口径、时间、范围、重复、汇率或税率、四舍五入、抽取时点；2）给每个假设标上验证成本和预计影响量级，按「便宜且影响大」排序；3）写出验证第一个假设的具体动作，需要谁提供什么数据；4）指出哪些假设即使成立也解释不了这么大的差，直接排除；5）给结论写法：目前能确认什么、还差什么、下一步找谁；6）提醒我在什么情况下该停止排查、先按哪个口径对外。不要为了让两边相等去调数。验收：每个假设都有验证动作，并能说清剩余差额由哪几部分组成。
Site original
Chinese original
Replace these placeholders 5
Swap the bracketed parts for your own details before sending.
[报表名与用途][时间范围][指标][金额或比例][口径]
How to use
先算差额占总盘子的比例，再决定值不值得查到底。
Try tweaking it
- Ask what evidence would overturn the judgement.
- Have it argue both sides with three reasons each.
What you should get
- A decision table: assumptions, evidence, counter-evidence
- A next action with an observable signal
Common mistakes
- Asking only "should I?" and getting equally valid answers both ways.
- Never asking for counter-examples, so you only hear support.
How to check the output
- It states what evidence would overturn the conclusion.
- Both sides are argued, with assumptions marked as such.
Where it works
- Good for: splitting a decision into assumptions, evidence and counter-cases, leaving the call to you.
- Watch out: ask what evidence would overturn the judgement, or you will only hear supporting reasons.